Cook Family
Genealogy Pages

Home Page  |  What's New  |  Photos  |  Histories  |  Headstones  |  Reports  |  Surnames
Search
First Name:


Last Name:



Sir Thomas Chaworth, Knight[1]

Male Abt 1370 - 1458  (~ 88 years)

Personal Information    |    Sources    |    All    |    PDF

  • Name Thomas Chaworth 
    Prefix Sir 
    Suffix Knight 
    Birth Abt 1370  Wiverton, Nottinghamshire, England Find all individuals with events at this location 
    Gender Male 
    Death 17 Feb 1458 
    Notes 
    • http://www.tudorplace.com.ar/CHAWORTH.htm#Thomas%20CHAWORTH%20(Sir%20Knight)1

      «b»Sheriff of Lincoln«/b» .<http://www.tudorplace.com.ar/Documents/sheriffs_of_lincoln.htm>

      Prepared to throw in his lot with the lollard leader, «b»Sir John Oldcastle«/b», whose plans for a rising in early Jan 1414 were promptly and efficiently quashed by the «b»King«/b». Sympathy for the lollards was strong in Derbyshire, and it is worth noting that another of «b»Oldcastle«/b»'s leading supporters, the lawyer, «b»Henry Booth«/b», also had estates there. Orders for «b»Chaworth«/b»'s arrest were issued on 8 Jan, and he once again found himself a captive in the Tower. He was at first kept in chains, but at the beginning of Feb bonds worth 1,000 marks were offered by «b»William Babington«/b» and his other friends as security that he would not attempt to escape if his conditions were ameliorated. Throughout this period he and his fellow captives remained under sentence of death, but in May they were pardoned and allowed to go free. It is now impossible to tell how far «b»Sir Thomas«/b» shared «b»Oldcastle«/b»'s heretical beliefs. His later life was given over to works of conventional piety, most notably with regard to the endowment and assistance of Launde priory in Leicestershire, although the evidence of his will shows him to have possessed a large number of devotional works (some of which were in English), including '«i»a graile «/i»(gradual)«i» manuell and a litel portose (breviary) the whiche the saide Sir Thomas toke with hym alway when he rode«/i»', so he may well have continued the lollard practice of placing particular emphasis on private prayer. The inclusion of his distant kinsman, «b»William Booth, Archbishop of York«/b», among the three supervisors of his will and his appointment, in 1423, of the «b»bishops of Durham«/b» and «b»Worcester«/b» as his trustees would, however, confirm that, in public at least, he eschewed any suspect doctrines. Once released from prison, «b»Sir Thomas«/b» understandably made every effort to re-establish himself in «b»King Henry«/b»'s good graces; and he seized the opportunity offered in 1415 by the latter's invasion of France to prove his loyalty. He indented to serve in the royal army with a personal retinue of eight men-at-arms and 24 archers, and was duly accorded the necessary letters of protection.
      Although he never quite managed to recover the position of trust which he had previously enjoyed, «b»Sir Thomas«/b» was in a sense able to compensate for this by making a remarkably lucrative second marriage. By his first wife, «b»Nicola«/b», he had only one child, a daughter named «b»Elizabeth«/b», who married «b»John, Lord Scrope of Masham«/b» (d.1455) before 1418, and seems to have become her father's favourite. Whereas «b»Nicola«/b» brought little in the way of property or advancement to the Chaworths, «b»Sir Thomas«/b»'s new bride, the daughter of «b»Sir Thomas Aylesbury«/b», added greatly to their territorial possessions. We do not know exactly what «b»Isabel«/b» received at the time of her marriage, but her father was extremely rich, and in May 1416 he made his new son-in-law one of his principal trustees. The latter was thus singularly well placed to advance his own interests when «b»Aylesbury«/b» died, two years later, and promptly obtained control of the manors of Milton Keynes in Buckinghamshire and Abinger in Surrey during the minority of his young brother-in-law, «b»John«/b». The successive deaths within the next five years of both «b»John«/b» and his baby son caused a edramatic change in «b»Chaworth«/b»'s circumstances, for his wife thus became coheir with her sister, «b»Eleanor«/b», of all her late father's property. Her share comprised the manors of Albury, Wilstone and Tiscott in Hertfordshire, Rousham in Oxfordshire, Sells Green in Wiltshire, Bradwell, Broughton and Drayton Beauchamp in Buckinghamshire, Oxhill in Warwickshire, and Dodford, Blatherwycke, Pytchley and Weston in Northamptonshire. She also inherited various tenements in Cripplegate, London. Altogether, these properties were worth a bare minimum of £93 p.a.; and although part of them remained in the hands of «b»Isabel«/b»'s widowed mother until 1436, the improvement in «b»Chaworth«/b»'s status and finances was still remarkable. He also kept up a wide and influential range of social connexions. In February 1419 he stood bail for «b»Sir John Pelham«/b» (an executor of «b»Henry IV«/b»), and a few weeks later he joined with «b»Sir Ralph Shirley«/b» in offering recognizances worth 200 marks to «b»Sir Richard Stanhope«/b». His relations with «b»Shirley«/b» did not remain cordial for long, since, as one of the heirs of «b»Lord Basset of Drayton«/b», he found himself drawn into an alliance with s20 «b» Humphrey, earl of Stafford«/b», who was determined to secure the entire «b»Basset«/b» inheritance for himself. Whereas «b»Chaworth«/b»'s mother had been prepared to relinquish her title to the «b»Staffords«/b», «b»Shirley«/b» clung on grimly to what was legally his, and thus met with the full force of «b»Earl Humphrey«/b»'s displeasure. «b»Shirley«/b» was eventually driven out of the property by force majeur, claiming that his eviction had been effected '«i»be the procurement and instance of Sir Thomas Chaworth«/i»'.10 As we have already seen, another prominent member of «b»Chaworth«/b»'s circle was «b»Sir John Zouche«/b», who conveyed his Yorkshire manor of Bolton-upon-Dearne to him, in 1422, as a trustee, and later made him a feoffee-to-uses of other property as well. «b»Zouche«/b»'s daughter, «b»Elizabeth«/b», married «b»Sir Nicholas Bowet«/b», a kinsman of «b»Henry Bowet, Archbishop of York«/b», and on the latter's death, in the following year, «b»Chaworth«/b» proceeded to exploit this connexion so that he could obtain custody of the temporalities of the archbishopric until the consecration of the next incumbent. He went on, some time later, to consolidate the relationship by arranging a marriage between his eldest son, «b»William«/b», and «b»Sir Nicholas«/b»'s daughter. «b»Chaworth«/b»'s young ward, «b»William Fitzwilliam of Sprotborough«/b» in Yorkshire, meanwhile proved a more than suitable husband for his younger daughter (another «b»Elizabeth«/b»), to whom he was betrothed while still a minor. An interesting list of «b»Chaworth«/b»'s other intimates is furnished by an enfeoffment of 1423, whereby he conveyed the bulk of his estates to a new body of trustees. As noted above, he probably chose the bishops of Durham and Worcester in order to demonstrate his return to orthodoxy, but his appointment of «b»Thomas, Lord Roos of Helmsley«/b», and «b»Ralph, Lord Cromwell«/b», provides a clear indication of where his temporal loyalties lay. He acted for a long time as «b»Roos«/b»'s feoffee-to-uses; and in 1434, some four years after the latter's death, he was permitted to farm the manor of Orston in Nottinghamshire during the minority of «b»Roos«/b»'s next heir. It was, however, «b»Chaworth«/b»'s association with «b»Lord Cromwell«/b» which proved of particular consequence, since through it he became drawn into Cromwell's longstanding and bitter feud with «b»Sir Henry Pierrepont«/b» (his colleague in the Parliament of 1423). Having wrested the «b»Heriz«/b» family inheritance from «b»Pierrepont«/b» by highly dubious means, «b»Cromwell«/b» secured his title, in 1431, by conveying the property to a panel of influential feoffees, including «b»Chaworth«/b» and his friend, «b»Sir Richard Vernon«/b». Not surprisingly, then, when violence erupted between «b»Pierrepont«/b» and his other enemies, the Foljambes, «b»Chaworth«/b» threw his not inconsiderable weight behind the Foljambes, and as head of the second jury at the Derby sessions of oyer and terminer, in 1434, he did everything he could to support their allegations. He even offered bail for «b»Richard Brown of Repton«/b», who stood accused of attempting to procure «b»Thomas Foljambe«/b»'s acquittal; and in the following year he and «b»Cromwell«/b» capitalized upon their position as royal commissioners of inquiry in Nottinghamshire to question Pierrepont's title to the manor of Sneinton. Later, in 1440, «b»Sir Henry«/b» tried to recover some of his losses by suing «b»Chaworth«/b» and «b»Lord Cromwell«/b»'s other trustees, but pressure was brought upon him to settle out of court. «b»Chaworth«/b» remained close to «b»Cromwell«/b» until the latter's death, for the two men acted together, on New Year's Day 1448, as witnesses to an oath made by «b»Richard Willoughby«/b», renouncing his inheritance. In later life he was recruited into the service of «b»Henry, duke of Warwick«/b», who made him and one of his sons joint stewards of his property in Leicestershire and Rutland.
      In May 1449 he and his sister-in-law (who had married «b»Sir Humphrey Stafford of Grafton«/b») complained to the «b»King«/b» about the damage done by deer from the forest of Rockingham to crops growing on their Northamptonshire estates, and were permitted to enclose the land in question. «b»Sir Thomas«/b» was able to consolidate his holdings even further as a result of the death, in about 1457, of «b»John Cressy«/b», whose next heirs were his wife and her sister. In the event, however, he did not enjoy the profits of these new acquisitions for very long, since his own death occurred, shortly after that of his wife, on 10 Feb 1459. The couple were buried together at the priory of Launde, where they had founded a chantry some seven years before.
      Although he must have been well over 80 when he died, «b»Chaworth«/b» remained active in local government until the very end.
    Person ID I28173  Glenn Cook Family
    Last Modified 15 Nov 2007 

    Father Sir William Chaworth,   b. 1351, Wiverton, Nottinghamshire, England Find all individuals with events at this locationd. Dec 1398 (Age 47 years) 
    Mother Alice Caltoft   d. Yes, date unknown 
    Marriage Abt 1364 
    Family ID F12852  Group Sheet  |  Family Chart

    Family 1 Nicola Braybrooke   d. Yes, date unknown 
    Marriage Between 1377 and 1403  Annesley, Nottinghamshire, England Find all individuals with events at this location 
    Children 
     1. Elizabeth Chaworth, Baroness Scrope of Masham,   b. Abt 1391   d. Bef 12 Mar 1466 (Age ~ 75 years)
    Family ID F12853  Group Sheet  |  Family Chart
    Last Modified 30 Nov 2006 

    Family 2 Isabel Aylesbury   d. Yes, date unknown 
    Marriage Abt 1429  Milton Keynes, Buckinghamshire, England Find all individuals with events at this location 
    Children 
     1. Sir George Chaworth, Knight,   b. Abt 1424, Wiverton, Nottinghamshire, England Find all individuals with events at this locationd. Yes, date unknown
     2. Sir William Chaworth, Knight,   b. Abt 1430, Wiverton, Nottinghamshire, England Find all individuals with events at this locationd. Abt 1467 (Age ~ 37 years)
     3. Elizabeth Chaworth,   b. 1420, Wiverton, Nottinghamshire, England Find all individuals with events at this locationd. Yes, date unknown
     4. John Chaworth,   b. Abt 1434, Wiverton, Nottinghamshire, England Find all individuals with events at this locationd. Yes, date unknown
    Family ID F12939  Group Sheet  |  Family Chart
    Last Modified 30 Nov 2006 

  • Sources 
    1. [S27] http://www.tudorplace.com.ar/.